a blog by Kifo
Jobs are hard to find these days, so it becomes a bit puzzling when *such sought after positions as journalists*, are occupied by such dull, senseless activists calling for the very heads that hand them food.
* - SARCASM
My prevailing thought, the requirements for a acquiring a journalism position: $100,000 debt, extreme self aggrandizement, and no gauge of common sense.
Maybe, news outlets such as Vice, require a massive amount of debt backpacked to their junior journalists as they find it easier to slowly indoctrinate them to their dangerously extreme liberal ideas, perpetuating power over their writers minds to ensure they follow the pandering express. Maybe. Is the widely celebrated practice of virtue signaling another immediate requirement made of these young people?
Why is that people, of my generation, tend to only acquire these ideologies when thrown into "echo chamber" ball pits.
Imagine, it is the one and only day of the year that it seems as if the entire world is catering to you. You are nine, your mother is taking you grocery shopping, pretending she has forgotten of this very special day. Of course, knowing you and your shit my pants when I am angry, attitude. You have played the cold shoulder card. Not a word has left your mouth since arriving in the kitchen this morning to no special treatment. At a certain point, you begin to notice subtle differences from the path traveled to the supermarket. The roads are different, as are the signs. Something is not as it seems. It takes up until the moment your mother parks the car in the front row of Chuck E. Cheese's to realize you are not going to the supermarket.
How dumb could you be?
Mother just went shopping three days ago. You ran out of Cinnamon Toast Crunch last week and nearly murdered your pet fish out of rage. You are not going shopping with Mom, the bitch tricked you. You take a step inside, and all your ugly unhygienic 3rd grade friends are screaming from the extreme doses of sugar planted into all Chuck E. Cheese food products.
What do you do first?
You have the place entirely to yourself. Trust me, I didn't know your mom was that rich either. I would have told her to buy me a cock ring and new Xbox a while ago. You know you're balling when your family has Chuck E. Cheese private party money. Why even ask the question? Your first move is to the ball pit. Understanding that no friend of yours dare move themselves around this premise without your presence, you can trust the ball pit to be puke free. You jump in. Imagine yourself sinking, slowly sinking down towards a bottom that does not exist. You softly and comfortably, continue to pass through colored ball after colored ball.
Now, I want you to imagine that these balls are no longer spray painted plastic balls, that certainly have no lead or hazardous fumes. These balls have morphed, shape shifted into a crowded mass of people. There are so many people, so close together that it is impossible to differentiate one from another. You can't tell whether the body beneath you floating was the same the body just twenty layers of people above you or entirely different. They are all speaking, in an offset harmony. A harmony that shares similar vocal inflection, tone and pitch, yet, the language itself is the only thing which differentiates between the indistinguishable mouth movements.
Many of you, including my editor and subconscious, are wondering what the fuck that meant. Give me a minute to try and figure that out.
Something to do with social media and how people will sink deep into their feeds, just looking at shit, not really listening or hearing what is being said. Then, looking around your profile, its hard to know who these people are. Are they real accounts, real people with real opinions, or are they some sort of weird mess of a mixture between bots, satire, and fake accounts?
Despite the headline of this article, I assured myself it was trash. Contrary to popular thought, reading a headline will not give you an idea of what the article is speaking of, and it just so happened to be good (the article). Funny and somewhat informative. You know me though, I never go against the good word of god, fingering and women are absolute no's for me.
I guess I should've titled this blog, hire a new Social Media person, because this title, while effective, is so hurtful. I am truly, deeply, profoundly hurt by such a statement. I thought it was the thought that counts. What If I am just trying my best? What if I had a carrot cutting accident when I was child and my fingers are all 3-D printed? Would you then poke fun? At the plight of a mans fingering technique, whom has none?
What if I told you I was 3-D printed? How would that make you feel?
I can't understand the logic behind this. What editor approved this?
I love how this articles starts out on flower pedals and sunshine. This author will have you know, yes, men who commit this crime, 100 out of 100 times, cause extreme pain, physical and mental. Yet, when it comes to women committing this crime, it is only somewhat possible (Around 20%) that the victim is actually a victim. Not every women who is convicted of raping a man actually raped them. FYI, men like sex, why else would they seduce and fool, of age, women to have sex with them? Why else would they run around in their tight chiseled under-aged bodies, other than to have women seduce and bed them? They are totally asking for it. How can your pussy not get wet when a client/student confesses their father is a savage and cocaine addict?
I just want to say, these women raped kids. According to our laws, they raped children. It doesn't matter how close one of them may be to the legal age, but what is more revolting is that this author wants us to sympathize with a being THAT HAD SEX WITH AN 11 YEAR OLD. I don't care what happens to you, or your family. That decision to fuck a 11 year old, should be a decision, beings are not allowed to come back from. Of course, you shouldn't locked in a cage for the rest of your life, yet at the same time, you should not expect us to release you back into the population just as you were before.
I would really love to see the spin behind this one. Kim Fakenameperson fucked a 11 year old, there is no spin, and the thing is, I want to know where this person is (If I were a parent). Not at all times, but if by some glorious holy miracle I was gifted a miraculous conception (I be praying god... Christmas is coming up yo) and god gave me a child through his seed, why should I trust you around my child? Because you've been shamed? Because this perpetrator believes the penance she has already paid was enough? Well I don't agree.
Like I said, this person made the bad decision to go ahead and fuck a minor. There are consequences and if those consequences protrude from your life, to the lives of your children as they grow, then so be it. Your children won't live with you forever. Even they should understand, at some point in their life, that the person they call mother is pedophile and that is why they suffered through hardship. Because of her, and her morose decision making, not because of the government and our laws.
I would love to ask this person, Derek Logue, about Michael Jackson, how about Kevin Spacey, what about the cases we see on the news? The ones in which masses of children have been sodomized.
Another aspect, of which I love, is the hypocrisy. There is this trend, of which it states, women and men are exactly identical in each and every way. Physically and mentally, there are 0 differences between women and men. Besides the science behind this issue, clearly proving this to fabrication, all it does it lead to hypocrisy such as this.
"There is a reality without pitying the women- I think we have to be careful not to fall into that trap- but there is a reality that is different for women offenders compared to men offenders in general".
Direct quote. For some reason, the author does not quote this psychologist when they justify that outlandish statement. Wage difference is what the psychologists uses as an example, and if you wholeheartedly believe in the statistics of the gender wage gap, then I have nothing for you.
I don't have enough information or understanding to explain it to you. What I can say, those statistics are skewed. The real disparity in wage is between blue collar workers, people who don't spend a 9-5 in a cubicle or open office space. It is between the waitresses, maids, hairdressers and oil riggers, miners, construction workers. If you don't get it by now, I might need to smash you with a club. Men in these underling positions are taking jobs that incur physical risk, and sometimes these men are even risking their lives just for a paycheck. While, being a waitress or maid is nothing to overtly demean, it is not the same thing as digging deep down below the surface of the ground we walk on, for precision metals.
So are women and men the same? Do we really want to enforce our businesses to dish out the same salary for working on a oil rig as for working behind a counter serving food? Because if they are and that is the plan, then the punishment for pedophilia should be the exact same for women as it is men.
entire article from vice.com
Comments are closed.
Follow Us Elsewhere